Investigation of Anti-HLA Antibodies of Highly Sensitized Patients by Single Antigen Bead and C1q Tests.

PURPOSE: The single antigen bead (SAB) test contributes to conventional cellular and solid phase crossmatch tests in renal transplantation. However, the determination of anti-HLA antibodies of the patients may not reflect the pathologic features of these antibodies. Highly sensitized patients produce antibodies against a number of HLAs; therefore, their transplantation chance decreases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate SAB and C1q test results of highly sensitized patients. METHOD: In this study, 33 end-stage renal failure patients with >80% panel reactive antibody were included. Of the patients, 58% (n = 19) were female, and 42% (n = 14) were male. The mean age was 46.2 ± 12.4. All of the serum samples were inactivated by heat before use. SAB and C1q tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: We obtained statistically significant results between the positive bead counts and raw mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of 2 tests (P < .01 for class I and II). There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 tests in terms HLA-A, -C, -DR, and -DP MFI values, whereas HLA-B and -DQ MFI values were similar for the 2 tests. CONCLUSION: The difference of raw MFI values between the 2 tests may be due to the fact that the C1q test detects only IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies, whereas the SAB test can detect all IgG subtypes. We considered that anti-HLA-B and -DQ antibodies have high complement-fixing features; these antibodies should be investigated selectively due to the similarity of anti-HLA-B and -DQ antibody MFI values in the 2 tests.

Kidney transplantation from hepatitis B (HB)-positive donors to HB negative recipients: anti-HB Core immunoglobulin G became positive in all recipients after the transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donors are not accepted by many transplant centers as a kidney source owing to risk of transmission of hepatitis B; however, some reports show that these donors can be used under a special protocol. Herein, we report our cases of kidney transplantation from HBsAg(+) donors to HbsAg(-) recipients. METHODS: In the years 2010-2012, we transplanted 4 kidneys from 4 HBsAg(+) donors to HBsAg(-) recipients. They were all living related. All antiHBs(-) recipients were vaccinated before transplantation and became HBsAg(-), anti-HB core immunoglobulin G antibody negative [antiHBcIg(-)], and antiHBs(+). Pretransplantation antiHBs titers were targeted to be >100 IU. If lower, hepatitis B Ig was used at the time of transplantation. One patient received hepatitis B Ig at the time of transplantation (owing to titer of 62 IU/L antiHBs). Lamivudine was prescribed for all kidney allograft recipients after transplantation. RESULTS: Two patients had special induction treatment including rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis owing to the presence of donor-specific antibody. CONCLUSIONS: All patients became antiHBcIgG(+) at 1-6 months after the transplantation, despite the presence of antiHBs positivity, which might be explained by transmission of hepatitis B virus through the graft.

Effect of daily sodium intake on post-transplant hypertension in kidney allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HT) is a common problem, observed frequently after kidney transplantation due to several causes. Posttransplantation HT increases the incidence of both cardiovascular diseases and allograft failure. Although a low sodium diet is strongly advised, the relationship between it and posttransplantation HT has not been well studied in transplant patients. METHODS: Thirty-eight kidney transplant patients with stable allograft function ≥ 6 months after transplantation with a history of blood pressures ≥ 120/80 mm Hg despite antihypertensive therapy were included in this study. Office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were performed before the study. We measured serum biochemistries, hemograms, as well as 24-hour urinary excretions of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, creatinine, and protein levels. After injection of low sodium diet of ≤ 80 mmol/d arranged by a dietician for 14 days, we repeated the measurements to compare the results. RESULTS: After 14 days, the low sodium diet decreased the office systolic (from 132.4 ± 18.8 to 123.7 ± 13.4 mm Hg; P < .001) and diastolic (from 87.3 ± 10.8 to 81.3 ± 7.0 mm Hg; P < .001) blood pressures with decreased sodium excretion (from 177.2 ± 72.7 to 85.3 ± 37.7 mmol/L; P < .001) in the 24-hour urine. It also decreased the average systolic (from 125.3 ± 11.1 to 120.5 ± 9.1 mm Hg) and diastolic (from 80.7 ± 8.3 to 76.9 ± 6.6 mm Hg, P < .001) blood pressures in the 24-hour ABPM. Nighttime systolic (from 120.7 ± 10.9 to 113.9 ± 19.7 mm Hg) and diastolic (from 77.0 ± 9.4 to 74.1 ± 7.8 mm Hg) blood pressures by 24-hour ABPM were significantly decreased (P < .01; P < .05). The low sodium diet had no effect on dipper versus nondipper HT development. Although sodium, calcium, and magnesium excretions in the 24-hour urine were decreased, there was no change in potassium and protein excretion levels. CONCLUSIONS: Daily sodium intake was extremely higher than recommended levels among kidney allograft recipients with HT. A low dietary sodium intake (80 mmol/d) combined with antihypertensive treatment controlled blood pressure efficiently by office and 24-hour ABPM readings.

Urinary tract infections following renal transplantation: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Although infectious complications are the second most common cause of death after transplantation, there appears to be insufficient data regarding the impact of urinary tract infections (UTIs) on graft outcome and patient mortality and morbidity. In this study, we evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and long-term effects of UTIs on graft function. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing the medical records of patients who received a renal transplant at our center from January 1999 to December 2006. All UTIs, risk factors, long-term graft function, graft loss, and death were recorded. Outcomes among patients with UTIs were compared with those without UTIs. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 136 patients (41.2%) had at least one UTI over a mean period of 38+/-25 months after transplantation. While there was a tendency toward graft loss among patients with UTIs (16.1% vs 6.3%, P=.08), there was no increased risk of death. The patients with UTIs displayed higher serum creatinine levels (1.7+/-1.4 vs 2.3+/-2.5 mg/dL, P=.07) compared to non-UTI patients in the long term. Upon multivariate analysis, female gender was the only risk factor for posttransplant UTIs. We did not determine any immunosuppressive drug as a risk factor for UTIs. The most frequent pathogens isolated in urine culture were Escherichia coli (n=72, 59.1%) and Klebsiella spp (n=21, 16.9%), and there were eight cases of bacteremia. CONCLUSION: UTIs are a frequent problem after kidney transplantation. Female recipients are at greatest risk. In the long-term, UTIs should be considered as a potential risk for poorer graft outcomes.

Ochrobactrum anthropi endocarditis and septic shock in a patient with no prosthetic valve or rheumatic heart disease: case report and review of the literature.

Although Ochrobactrum anthropi is an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised patients, it is increasingly being recognized to be a causative agent in healthy hosts. In this paper, we report a case of O. anthropi endocarditis and septic shock in a patient who had no prosthetic valve or rheumatic heart disease, in contrast to previous reports.